The UK Doesn’t Have a Talent Problem — It Has a Strategy Problem
Over the past few years, I’ve hired a lot of graduates. I’m a huge believer in aspiring talent, and I’ve always had a soft spot for driven young people who want to make a name for themselves.
But recently, a pattern has emerged in conversations with graduates, young professionals, and students:
They’re entering the workforce not just with debt — but with debt that grows faster than it can be repaid.
According to the House of Commons Library, the average borrower finishing their course in 2024 graduated with £53,000 of student debt when they became liable to repay — before they’ve even settled into their careers.
Meanwhile, The Guardian recently reported that more than 150,000 UK graduates now have student loan debts over £100,000.
This isn’t just unsustainable.
It’s counterproductive.
How We Compare to Europe
Having worked internationally and maintained a global network for 15+ years, I’ve always been proud of what being a British graduate afforded me.
I struggle to say the same in 2026.
Across Europe, the contrast is stark:
- Germany, Denmark and Finland offer low or zero tuition fees
- Where debt exists, it’s lower interest and income-aligned
- Systems are designed to encourage skilled graduates, not financially punish them
The result?
Europe supports talent growth.
The UK financially handicaps it.
At a time when we are competing globally for talent in life sciences, biotech, engineering, and technology, that difference matters. I can appreciate through times of challenge, highly desirable personal qualities emerge. Currently, the UK has a system that self harms.

The Graduates Who Drive Industry Forward Aren’t Always the Ones With the Easiest Start
Throughout my career, I’ve consistently gravitated toward graduates who haven’t come from wealth, networks, or privilege.
Not because hardship is romantic — but because it often builds qualities industry desperately needs:
- Resilience
- Accountability
- Resourcefulness
- Ambition to change their circumstances
When you’ve worked part-time through school, supported family, or navigated life without a financial safety net, it changes your mindset. Targets matter. Progress matters. Outcomes matter.
These individuals are the fuel behind many of the UK’s strongest scaling companies.
And yet, this is exactly the profile punished hardest by a student loan system built on high fees and compounding interest.
It’s a quiet tragedy — and more importantly, it’s strategically irrational.
If the UK wants a competitive future workforce — engineers, scientists, analysts, commercial leaders, entrepreneurs — it needs to recognise that talent comes from every background, not just those who can absorb educational cost.

Debt Is Changing Student Behaviour
A growing number of smart, capable young people are:
- Choosing apprenticeships over university
- Entering the workforce earlier to avoid debt
- Working during sixth form and university to minimise borrowing
- Questioning whether a degree is worth a £50,000–£100,000 burden
This isn’t theoretical — it’s happening now.
And it raises uncomfortable but necessary questions:
How many potential scientists, engineers, analysts, clinicians or innovators are we losing because they don’t want to mortgage their future before it begins?

This Matters to Me Professionally
Having hired graduates for nearly twenty years, I’ve seen first-hand the energy, intelligence, and ambition they bring. I’ve also seen how linking personal milestones to business outcomes transforms performance.
But it’s getting harder.
When does the UK expect graduates to think about buying a home with this level of academic debt?
Genuinely — what’s the answer?
“A City Company, Out of the City”
I ran my previous business in London for nearly five years. Eventually, I became tired of the swelling cost of having a job in London — and graduates felt this even more.
The current UK system makes it harder to encourage graduates into major cities on entry-level salaries. Should a graduate need a credit card just to cover the gap while they establish themselves?
I don’t believe so.
Part of the reason I chose to base Allerton Bishop in Bishop’s Stortford is the strength of the local talent pipeline and professional communities.
Schools like Bishop’s Stortford High, Avanti, Hockerill College and Leventhorpe have excellent reputations and consistently produce globally-minded, academically strong, workforce-ready young people.
Allerton Bishop can offer careers to students, graduates and aspiring trainees without the burden of excessive personal costs. But shouldn’t the UK be supporting London businesses before there is major, more impactful shift?
How does the appeal of London jobs resurface again?
Allerton Bishop will be nothing without exceptional people — and creating genuine career opportunities has always been something I’m most proud of. Our Bishop’s Stortford base will allow future employees to build careers without immediately absorbing the financial burden of a broken system.

If the UK Is Serious About Competing Globally, We Need a Future Strategy
The UK cannot remain globally competitive if its graduate system saddles debt on young people and favours the wealthy.
That’s not how you build a world-class workforce.
That’s how you erode one.
If we want the next generation of scientists, analysts, entrepreneurs, educators and innovators, we need to:
- Fund education intelligently
- Support those trapped in the current system
- Treat higher education as a strategic investment, not a private commodity
I want to be proud again.
We should want the same as a country.
If we want to assert ourselves as a global power, strengthening our talent foundation is not optional — it’s the first step.